Re: SCARLET ACCUSED OF FRAUD by former National Security Council Official!
And just 4 posts later you stated it’s not a lie to say you will do something that is scientifically possible if not probable’
So when you stated it was probable you want that to read how exactly? The exchange that followed you repeatedly stated that it was going to succeed , and dismissed the notion of it being unlikely based on the combination of known dose limiting AEs and low enough doses avoiding AEs would fail immunogenicity.
What’s the dose?